23 January 2007


Eucharist and Suffering


“...Burnt offering from me you would refuse, my sacrifice, a contrite spirit, a humbled, contrite heart you will not spurn. .” Psalm 51

I'll open with a few words from the combox (but too good to be kept there):
from Gabrielle:
Just as God is hidden from us, the way in which we "take the Eucharist to the streets" can be hidden; just as Christ makes His ceaseless sacrifice, there are those who also make a ceaseless sacrifice in unity with Him, but it is not "out there" for all the world to see. Even their exterior works, done with compassion and with the desire to live the gospel, are performed quietly, and often anonymously.

from Carol:
…yes, some live as Eucharist in a very different way. To me, those feed the best. Those who are eucharistic via imbibing and consuming Him, first.

We might even argue that the “hidden holocausts” are the cleanest, as they are untainted – the agonies we hold in our hearts are known only to Him, offered for love of Him alone, as we gain nothing from others by them.

I have been thinking about suffering a lot lately, and keep coming up against this inescapable conclusion:
to live and to love in this life is to suffer.

I could go on and on (as you all well know) and discuss the whats and whys of suffering (maybe we’ll do that later) but I want to jump ahead to make the connection between suffering and the Eucharist.

On one level, this connection is obvious: if the Eucharist is the “clean oblation” of the Cross, then the suffering dimension is clear. But how do our very personal sufferings fit in?

In order to grasp this fully (we all “get it” on a basic level, but in order to “live the Eucharist” we need to understand it experientially) we need to contemplate our own capacity for “redemptive suffering” and the invitation extended by Christ to each of us to participate in His Sacrifice.

Suffering helps the sufferer, suffering opens up avenues of grace and allows God to reach in and work miracles, and our own suffering can also help others. They may be inspired by our faith, fortitude, perseverance; they are given an opportunity to give of themselves for our sake, like Simon and the Good Samaritan; and, at the highest level, we can participate in the very Redemption itself by immolating ourselves for others.

There is the penance aspect of this, yes – we “make reparation” for our sins and the sins of others by "making sacrifices" – but if we don’t move beyond that to LOVE, we’ve missed the point and fallen into a morose rigidity that falls short of the Spirit of Christ. One who is stoically “offering it up” and seeing this as a kind of business transaction (an exchange of suffering for punishment of sins) can hardly join with St. Paul in exclaiming, “Now I rejoice in my sufferings for your sake…” (Colossians)

This joy, John Paul II tells us, “comes from the discovery of the meaning of suffering.” (Salvifici Doloris) This meaning is manifold, and we could compose volumes discussing it. But at the core is the truth that “We are always carrying in the body the death of Jesus, so that the life of Jesus may also be manifested in our bodies.” (II Cor)

We have the almost unbelievable privilege of participating in the Redemption itself, of joining ourselves to the One Sacrifice of Christ, because He lives in us and we in Him. When nailed to the Cross, Christ offered Himself to the Eternal Father as Head of the whole human race, of the Mystical Body; in the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, He offers to the Father not only Himself as Head of the Church, but all His members also, since we are united with Him and He holds each of us in His Heart. We are all included in that offering, and it is at Mass, in union with the Mass, that we offer all that we have to offer. We actually insert our sufferings into His, to “complete what is lacking in the sufferings of Christ,” not because the Redemption is incomplete, but because the Redemption remains open always to all love expressed in human suffering.
“In this dimension – the dimension of love – the Redemption which has already been completely accomplished is, in a certain sense, constantly being accomplished….Yes, it seems to be part of the very essence of Christ’s redemptive suffering that this suffering requires to be unceasingly completed.” (Salvifici Doloris)

It is “unceasingly completed” by those willing to love to the point of suffering, who are willing to suffer and become “hidden holocausts” of love.

And everything is offered to the Father only through Christ: “through Him, with Him, in Him, in the unity of the Holy Spirit.” There is no other way to the Father but through Him. There is only One Sacrifice, in which we may participate, and through which we make our own offering.

If we "present our bodies as a living sacrifice, holy and acceptable to God, which is our spiritual worship," (Romans) then we are presenting our bodies to be gradually crucified, in union with Christ. And it is through this death to self that we live in Christ and Christ in us: "I have been crucified with Christ, it is no longer I who live, but Christ who lives in me." (Galatians) We are united to Christ through the Cross which we embrace with love.
That little drop of water that the priest pours into the chalice of wine is like our little ordinary offerings, which are completely absorbed into the Blood of Christ and transformed. Just as at Cana Christ took something very ordinary (water) and transformed it into something beyond our capacity (the "best wine") because it was brought in simplicity and His word was obeyed, so our own very ordinary offerings are transformed within the Chalice of His Heart by His immense Love and become something worthy of the Father.

17 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

:-)
So beautifully said. Like pinks and purples and amber of summer sunset. Gorgeous, your voice.

The greatest poverty I ever underwent was to offer what I thought was my death for an enemy..she was no enemy, she was bitter and wounded beyond what she could take. She didn't want the fire to go away, but it always did. I had no virtue, but His, in which to offer..I asked in the poverty of not knowing if my little offering was abhorrent, if her fire could stay with her next time. We must never allow the word abhorrent into our vocabulary. Our love is never so.

Oh gosh, forgive me all my words, but you make me sing. Suffering.. I will think about this and the Eucharist.

Tuesday, January 23, 2007 7:03:00 PM  
Blogger Gabrielle said...

I think the penance aspect of this is similar to the "imperfect and perfect" forms of contrition experienced in the Sacrament of Reconciliation.

In the beginning, the penances undertaken, the attempts at reparation for one's own sins or others' sins may be done in the way you describe, kt, more as an exchange of suffering for sin, just as imperfect contrition is sorrow for sin because of fear of hell.

But as the person grows spiritually, and grows in love, contrition becomes perfect. Sorrow for sin no longer stems from fear, but from love, knowing we have offended Him whom we love. The desire to make reparation can undergo a similar transformation; it can become perfect in love, becoming a willingness to share completely in His sacrifice, by taking on the sins of others, and by paying the price for them.

Wednesday, January 24, 2007 1:48:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Only in the Eucharist within us do we have life (healing, transforming, redemptiveness) enough to make reparation. We cannot transfer a grace obtained for us to another, but we can atone for him through suffering the pain of his sin. A long time ago, I offered to take on part of the burden of a priest's sin, and then, of a man's sin.. it was scary to say so to Him; only He knows what the burden is, and back then, love of Him was but also was not the seat of my offering, and I knew that He knew. The burden was dark, heavy, much bigger than me, much bigger than my love. If we don't absolutely live for His love, it seems we can do nothing for another, except to have goodwill. His Body and Blood is lent us in this life, as we consume Him. Spiritual communion is but a pilot light.. it keeps things from going out entirely. Holy communion is necessary, then, for love. Am I understanding aright?

Wednesday, January 24, 2007 11:12:00 AM  
Blogger KathrynTherese said...

Yes, Holy Communion is necessary for love to be full and free. Unless we receive, we have no life in us, and our love is no more than what is natural.

In the Old Testament, God could only command us to do what we were able, and so He commanded that we love our neighbors as ourselves.

It wasn't until Christ came among us and was ready to lay down His life for us that He gave us a New Commandment. He set aside His garments, bent low to wash the feet of His disciples (including the one He knew would betray Him) and then said, "Love one another as I have loved you." This was completely new, but He had shown us the way, was about to give us Himself as Food and offer Himself as Victim for our sin, and so now we might understand what Love is. Love is Christ. His life is our Way. In the Eucharist, He strengthens us to embrace this commandment and love as He loves, love with His own love, love one another with the very love of the Trinity which is poured into us.

We cannot love without Love.
We must receive Love in order to give love to others.

Wednesday, January 24, 2007 9:47:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Odd.. earlier today, I was thinking about the Master washing feet. When Peter said, "Oh, no--You mustn't!" He replied, "Unless I wash you, you can have no part in Me." Peter, abashed at his near loss, replied, "My hands and my head, too, Lord!" Then Jesus said, "You are all clean, except for your feet." He didn't mean that only literally, right? The Apostles had been made clean in Him..somehow - unless they all had come straight from the sea, they were in a state of grace.. except for their feet which had trod and would have to continue to tred upon earth a while. Not of the world, these and us, but in it. The earth was not yet redeemed that night; His blood would sanctify it. Judas got his feet dirty with the world's soil, somehow. Yet he, too, might've been washed of it, again, had he not run away and settled the matter another way. Peter would've washed him, as Peter does til this very day, in Christ's name.

I came across the Lent-Pascha newsletter of the Holy Transfiguration Monastery earlier tonight. An excerpt from a Br. Symeon musing: "All Carmelites traditionally have in their monastic cells a bare cross without a corpus, because they are to see themselves as placed on the Cross for the salvation of the world.." I didn't know that there was poverty even of the Cross for Carmelites.

Wednesday, January 24, 2007 10:46:00 PM  
Blogger Gabrielle said...

These are beautiful musings, and I'd like to come back tomorrow to let them sink in a bit more, but for now, may I just ask a question about something Carol said; is it true that we can't transfer a grace obtained for us to another? Could someone talk about this a little bit please? (and thank you) :)

Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:40:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well, reading Carol is like reading a translated page, so before I cause anyone lookup labor for clarity, let me clarify more.. i.e., one cannot receive the grace of Holy Communion for another, one cannot receive the grace of absolution for another, but one can ask for any merit that may come to one, to go to another, most especially the Poor Souls. And tho' I have asked it anyhow, because one certainly can (in Him) help atone for another, one cannot transfer to another an indulgence granted. Oui?

Love,
Carol

Thursday, January 25, 2007 7:37:00 AM  
Blogger Gabrielle said...

Thanks, Carol; yes, that is what I had thought about it also.

The aspect of going beyond stoicism, and even going beyond the desire to suffer in unison with Christ, still does not reach the level of joy that kt is talking about.

One thing that I always wonder about in regard to this is, do we see joy in Christ during the Crucifixion? Joy in the Resurrection, yes, but do we see any joy in Christ during the Passion or the Crucifixion? If yes, I would like to hear your reflections on that, but if no, then why do we talk about actual joy in suffering?

Thursday, January 25, 2007 12:54:00 PM  
Blogger KathrynTherese said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

Thursday, January 25, 2007 2:29:00 PM  
Blogger KathrynTherese said...

My friend, who we will call “Fr. Caterpillar” (this because he humbly keeps himself low to the ground, waiting for his grace-filled metamorphosis in which he will burst forth in other-worldly wings), says this:
None of the graces any one of us receives are received for ourselves only, but help synergize all who are members of the corporate Christ: the Corpus Mysticum. Musings about intentionality regarding graces received is a presumptuous misunderstanding of the Corpus Mysticum in its mysterious truth. To paraphrase C. S. Lewis who said the man in search of God is like the mouse in search of the cat: the idea of passing graces I've received to another is of a piece with the delusion of the man who thinks he is pushing the bus he's riding in. ... the innocent intentions behind those who envision grace as either a substance or a product that can be transported between destinations …bespeak a utilitarian vision of the Mystery that borders on the irreverent. Let us content ourselves with being grace-filled cells of the Corpus Mysticum, assuming that thoughts of transferring graces from one such cell to another betoken a remnant of the cancer of sin in our fallen intellect that those same graces are in the process of removing, a la divine chemotherapy. Let us leave, therefore, all thoughts of how what he is doing with me is helping/assisting another member of His Corpus Mysticum to Him alone who knows best; Who, indeed, alone knows anything about the mysterious synergy His Spirit enables within His Corpus Mysticum.

Or, as I often say, we shouldn’t keep “tally marks” and think we keep grace in a kind of account that can be added to, borrowed from, or given out of. That said, we DO, as the Mystical Body, have the privilege of helping one another, physically and spiritually, on our way to Him.

In the words of the Church:
“With regard to God, there is no strict right to any merit on the part of man…The merit of man before God in the Christian life arises from the fact that God has freely chosen to associate man with the work of his grace. …Moved by the Holy Spirit and by charity, we can then merit for ourselves and for others the graces needed for our sanctification, for the increase of grace and charity, and for the attainment of eternal life…
The charity of Christ is the source in us of all our merits before God.”

~CCC 2006-2011

So, beyond the truth that when we are filled with grace, the whole Body of Christ benefits, we can also "call down grace" for one another by our prayers and sacrifice.

As for Gabrielle's question about joy in suffering, I think that is matter for a whole new post, don't you?

Thursday, January 25, 2007 2:29:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Tally" is an inaccurate assumption/word/understanding, here, for I am not Robyn Hood, tho' I do like the tights. And it would seem that kt and the Catechism contradict Fr. Caterpillar, but even without that, I will cling by two fingers to the cliff of Christ's Can-Do, which is still and always mystery. But yes, Gabrielle, Christ's Passion was indeed of utter joy. His heart burst from joy, not horror, not sword.

Thursday, January 25, 2007 3:12:00 PM  
Blogger KathrynTherese said...

I think Fr. Caterpillar's remarks are meant to deter us from thinking in terms of "earning grace" or, as you said Carol, "transferring a grace" to another, a la Robin Hood (tights notwithstanding). As your comments suggest, this is to misunderstand the nature of grace. They are not tangible commodities to exchange.

And yet, in the scheme of "Christ's Can-Do, which is still and always mystery" (I love that) we can help one another along the way, meriting (this is the only word we have, though we know grace is PURE GIFT and cannot be "merited" in the strict definition of that term) God's favor for ourselves and for one another.

In Salvifici Doloris, JPII describes the connection this way:
In that "cosmic" struggle between the spiritual powers of good and evil, spoken of in Ephesians, human sufferings, united to the redemptive suffering of Christ, constitute a special support for the powers of good, and open the way to the victory of these salvific powers.

That sums up what you are saying, Carol. That we can indeed merit for one another, but that we leave the application to the mystery of God.

Just for the record, you are correct that we cannot "transfer to another an indulgence granted" but we CAN apply indulgences to the souls in Purgatory.

Thursday, January 25, 2007 3:35:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I would give all my indulgences away, now, as I gave them before 2 Easters ago. (I hadn't known that what I was praying nightly along with daily Mass and frequest confession, etc., was indulgenced. It was good to find out.) I kept that one, tho', the Divine Mercy one granted while JP II was crossing over to catch up to his little everycatholic, Terri Schiavo. It seemed his own gift to us, didn't it..that his last moment also lead us closer, closer, closer.. I needed that clearing out of all detritus. And believe I received it. That's why I'll never worry about topping off my own store. I'm fine (unless and until I sin mortally, God forbid), and I can see that there isn't much I can do for others while we are trapped here, but Purgatory is an us-thing of the first magnitude, and our help there is all but unlimited, it seems. In/with/through the grace of Christ, yes - if ever I don't add that, it's because I presume I am speaking to/with Catholics for whom it goes without saying.

Friday, January 26, 2007 3:19:00 AM  
Blogger Gabrielle said...

kt said: [I think Fr. Caterpillar's remarks are meant to deter us from thinking in terms of "earning grace" or, as you said Carol, "transferring a grace" to another...]

I think it is unfortunate that Fr. Caterpillar's response is focusing on the idea of "transferring" graces, when Carol immediately clarified her comment for my benefit and the benefit of anyone else who may be reading here.

We were having a discussion about becoming "holocaust" in relation to the power of the Holy Eucharist in our lives. It seems to me only natural then, that the subject would arise of offering up, in all humility, any graces or consolations which the Lord may see fit to bestow on us, for the benefit of another soul, either here on earth or in Purgatory. It also seems to me that understanding that this is possible, in humility and only with His grace, and cooperating with Him in this way for the salvation of others, is a far cry from "musings about intentionality regarding graces received."

I doubt very much that anyone here envisions "grace as either a substance or a product that can be transported between destinations", and the idea of "tallying", well, in all frankness and honesty, the thought has never occurred to me, not even as a child.

As laypeople, and many of us without spiritual directors, we so long for the input of holy priests, which we rarely receive. To have the benefit of a priest in a discussion, and to have words such as presumptuous, misunderstanding, delusion, irreverent and cancer thrown at us based on one mischosen word [transferring] which was immediately clarified, brings me great sadness.

Friday, January 26, 2007 11:17:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It might be the limited medium..it might be me.. I always kinda envied Zorro's rather mute sidekick, as well as Groucho's.. I practiced the whistles, eyebrows, and smiles.. just in case. There came another mute one I would emulate, and it hurts to practice him, but what he was about to say is here behind my tongue as well, and may it be the last phrase I choke on, too.

Friday, January 26, 2007 1:37:00 PM  
Blogger KathrynTherese said...

In all honesty, I am sorry that I posted the comments without explaining myself. There are many people who read our words who do not respond in the combox, and often respond to me via email. I did not mean for them to be taken as a rebuttal of Carol's remarks (I know Carol too well to think her understanding would fall short of the all-encompassing, all-powerful, prodigal gift of God's grace).

I posted those remarks to address an attitude that is more common than those engaged here in the discussion might think: that of "getting all the grace I can get" and then deciding for oneself whether or not to offer it back to the Lord to do with as He sees fit. If you don't know people like this, you are truly blessed to be surrounded by holy souls who have a grasp of the true nature of grace as pure gift.

But a lot of people tend to see their conscience as tallies of "good deeds" and "not-so-good deeds" and think that if they keep the balance tipped toward "good deeds" they will be ok. They see every Rosary as another tick mark, and every sacrifice as somehow maybe erasing one of the "not-so-good deed" tallies. It is a very tight balance sheet they believe God keeps, and they must keep track of their account.

This is exhausting and frustrating for them, and falls far short of the Truth that will give them the freedom to be generous with themselves and with all God gives them. It can lead to a selfward perfectionism from which it can be almost impossible to find their way out of.

The Suffering book appealed to so many of these kinds of personalities because it opened up for them the reality of God's openness, generosity, forgiveness, and love; a love that absolutely does NOT keep tallies ("But what about remaining in Purgatory until 'every penny is repaid?'" one dear soul, trembling on the precipice of full surrender asked me. I hesitated for a moment and then said, "Love is the whole Law. Pennies have nothing to do with Love." It seemed I saw Light rising behind her eyes just then.).

So, forgive me if I have offended anyone here; it was not my intention. But sometimes it is helpful to overstate the obvious for the benefit of those for whom it is not yet clear as day.

And I am grateful to be engaged in these discussions with people for whom it is ;-)

Friday, January 26, 2007 4:30:00 PM  
Blogger myosotis said...

Hi ladies...I don't have much to add here because although I've been following, I kind of got lost...
But I am glad about one thing, Carol...that link is wonderful. I'd just got off the skype connection with padre salvatore, and there were more smiles like his, more loving eyes like his. I feel warm inside. It's a good feeling. thanks

Friday, January 26, 2007 5:44:00 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home